La lettre de la Preuve |
|
ISSN 1292-8763 |
|
2001 |
Castella C. (2001) Un objet de savoir spécifique en jeu dans la résolution de problèmes : le fonctionnement mathématiques. Recherche en didactique des mathématiques 20(3) 331-380. |
|
Samper C., Leguizámon C., Camargo L. (2001) razonamiento en geometriá. Revista EMA 6(2) 141-158. |
|
Lay S. R. (2001) Analysis with an Introduction to Proof (3rd Edition). Pearson Education. |
2000 |
Breton P., Gauthier G. (2000) Histoire des théorie de l'argumentation. Paris : La Découverte. |
|
de Villiers M., Mudaly V. (2000) Learners' Needs for Conviction & Explanation within the Context of Dynamic Geometry. Pythagoras 52, 20-23 |
|
Dreyfus T. (2000) La demostración como contenido a lo largo del curriculum. In: Gorgorió N., Deulofeu J., Bishop A. (eds.) Matemáticas y Educación: Retos y cambios desde una perspectiva internacional (pp. 125-134). Barcelona: Graó ICE-UB. |
|
Dreyfus T. (2000). Some views on proofs by teachers and mathematicians. In: Gagatsis A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics Education. Nikosia (Vol. 1, pp. 11-25). Cyprus: The University of Cyprus. |
|
Hanna G. (2000) A critical examination of three factors in the decline of proof. Interchange 31(1) 21-33. |
|
Mariotti M. A. (2000) La démonstration en mathématiques. In: Actes de la conférence "Enseigner les Mathématiques". Enseigner les mathématiques. Juillet 2000, Grenoble. |
The following references are taken from : |
|
Arzarello F. (2000) Inside and outside: Space, time and language in proof production. Plenary Lecture. Vol. 1, p. 23-38. |
|
Okazaki M., Iwasaki H. (2000) Geometric construction as threshol of proof: the figure as a cognitive tool for justification. Short Oral Communication. Vol.1 p. 180-183. |
|
Chin E.-T., Tall D. (2000) Making, having and copressing formal mathematical concepts. Research Reports. Vol. 2 p. 177-184 |
|
Dueck N., Scali E. (2000) About argumentation and conceptualization. Research Reports. Vol. 2, p. 257-264. |
|
Harada K., Gallou-Dumiel E., Nohda N. (2000) The role of figures in geometrical proof-probel solving: Students' cognitions of geometrical figures in france and Japan. Research Reports. Vol. 3 p. 25-32 |
|
Krummheuer G. (2000) Narrative elements in mathematical argumentation in primary education. Research Reports. Vol. 3 p. 175-182. |
|
Miyazaki M. (2000) What are essential to applay the "discovery" function of proof in lower secondary school mathematics? Research Reports. Vol. 4 p. 1-7. |
|
Sekiguchi Y. (2000) A teaching experiment on mathematical proof: roles of methafor and externalization. Research Reports. Vol. 4 p. 129-136. |
|
Simon M. A. (2000) Reconsidering mathematical validation in the classroom . Research Reports. Vol. 4 p. 161-167. |
Archive |
Atiyah M. (1994) Response to "Theoretical mathematics: toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics" by Jaffe A., Quinn F. Bulletin of the American mathematical society 30(2) 178-207 |
|
Beaudichon J., Ducroux N., Lamalle J., Laforesterie A. (197-) A propos de l'étude génétique de l'un des aspects de l'intelligence sociale : recherches expérimentales sur l'argumentation et la persuasion chez l'enfant. Bulletin de psychologie XXXII(340) 577-591. |
|
Breton P. (1996) L'argumentation dans la communication. Paris : La Découverte. |
|
Burstall R. (1991) Computer Assisted Proof for Mathematics: an Introduction using the LEGO Proof System. LFCS report. ECS-LFCS-91-132 |
|
Jaffe A., Quinn F. (1993) Theoretical mathematics: toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics. Bulletin of the American mathematical society 29(1) 1-13 |
|